| Small
Grant Program |
| The
" Small Grant Program for Nebraska Women in Science"
will award competitive grants |
| ranging from $1500 to $3000
per award. The objective of these
awards is to help women |
| faculty enhance their research competitiveness. The
grants are intended for such
|
| activities as: |
|
Travel to conferences related to research |
|
Travel to NSF Headquarters to meet with program officers |
|
Travel
to workshops or training sessions related to a specific research
project |
|
Buying
software or other tools for research projects |
|
Hiring
graduate assistants for research projects |
|
Supporting
course buyouts for research time |
|
| Eligibility |
| All
women faculty in universities in the state of Nebraska who are
engaged in research in |
| science,
mathematics, engineering and technology fields
are eligible. Clinical medicine and |
| production
agriculture are excluded, since NSF does not support
these areas. If you have any |
| questions about eligibility, please contact
ILZE
ZIGURS, chair of the evaluation committee , |
| at (izigurs@unomaha.edu)
or at 402.554.3182. |
|
| Deadline
and Place for Submission |
| Grant
proposals must be submitted no later than midnight of Friday,
May 30, 2003. |
| Proposals must
be in the form of a Rich Text Format
document and submitted at the Small |
| Grant Program
website, http://cmit.unomaha.edu/wise/submit.asp.
The website will be |
| open
for
submission on MAY 15. |
|
| Format
and Contents of Proposal |
| Proposals are
strictly limited to a total of 3 pages, single-spaced. |
The first two pages should contain: |
|
1. Your name and the title of the project |
|
2. Brief description of the specific research for which the grant
would |
|
be used. |
|
3. Amount of funds requested and what the funds would be used for
(maximum |
|
amount is $3000). |
|
4. Explanation of how the award would help build your competitiveness |
|
in research. |
| Be as specific as possible as to how the award would increase the probability of success in |
| your research, e.g., in starting a new research project, developing a research proposal to a |
| funding agency, or finishing a project.
Show how the grant is really important to getting |
| innovative work
done, e.g., because of inaccessibility to alternate funding. If
you hold a |
| post-doc
position, show how the research that you are doing is independent
from the group in |
| which you work. |
The third page should consist of a CV that contains
the following details: |
|
1. Name, rank, department and school affiliation, complete contact
information. |
|
2. Academic degrees received, where and when. |
|
3. Grants received, when and from what source. |
|
4. Complete citation information for five
most recent publications. |
|
5. Summary info for other publications - how many; any other info
you want to |
|
provide within the one page allowed. |
|
|
| Criteria
for Award |
| Awards will be made based on
the extent to which the applicant can show that the grant will |
|
increase her competitiveness as a researcher and help her
overcome specific barriers. |
| Preference will
be given to people early in their careers who have not been able
to get |
| competitive
funding elsewhere and to mid-career people who are forging a new
research |
| direction. The
program is not intended fro those who are competitively funded at
the |
| national level. |
|
| Decision
Process,
Timeline, and Follow up |
| A small committee
of faculty will evaluate the applications. |
| Awards will be
announced by July 1, 2003. Funds must be spent by
December
31, 2003. |
| Given the short
time between submission and award decisions, late applications
cannot |
| be considered.
Proposals that do not follow the required format and submission
process |
| will
not be considered. |
|